ArticlePrecision clinical medicine2025
Predictive model for daily risk alerts in sepsis patients in the ICU: visualization and clinical analysis of risk indicators.
Article in Precision clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Supervised Fine-Tuned Large Language Model for Lifestyle Management in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Development and Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- A multicenter machine learning model for predicting ICU mortality in mechanically ventilated patients: development and external validation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Management and Prediction of Acute Pancreatitis Severity Using AI: A Surgical Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio and the Risk of Sepsis in Patients With Heart Failure: Retrospective Cohort Study From Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence based predictive models for early sepsis detection in intensive care units: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Enhancing prognostic accuracy in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy: a machine learning approach.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Association between hemoglobin glycation index and mortality in critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a novel Transformer-based time-series framework designed to revolutionize risk stratification in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) by predicting patient outcomes with high temporal precision. Leveraging sequential data from the eICU database, our two-stage architecture dynamically captures evolving health trajectories throughout a patient's ICU stay, enabling real-time identification of high-risk individuals and actionable insights for personalized interventions. The model demonstrated exceptional predictive power, achieving a progressive AUC increase from 0.87 (±0.021) on admission day to 0.92 (±0.009) by day 5, reflecting its capacity to assimilate longitudinal physiological patterns. Rigorous external validation across geographically diverse cohorts-including an 81.8% accuracy on Chinese sepsis data (AUC=0.73) and 76.56% accuracy on MIMIC-IV-3.1 (AUC=0.84)-confirmed robust generalizability. Crucially, SHAP-derived temporal heatmaps unveiled mortality-associated feature dynamics over time, bridging the gap between model predictions and clinically interpretable biomarkers. These findings establish a new paradigm for ICU prognostics, where data-driven temporal modeling synergizes with clinician expertise to optimize triage, reduce diagnostic latency, and ultimately improve survival outcomes in critical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.