Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40041293›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology report2025

Assessing losses and gains with ageing: the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire.

Zadworna Magdalena, Paweł J Brudek, Ken Laidlaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology report, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zadworna MagdalenaInstitute of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0585-019X
Paweł J BrudekInstitute of Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0251-9415
Ken LaidlawDepartment of Psychology, University of Exeter, Washington Singer Laboratories, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3091-7277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Attitudes to Ageing Questionnaire (AAQ) is a measure designed for cross-cultural comparisons of attitudes to ageing from the perspective of older adults. The article presents a cultural and linguistic adaptation of the AAQ for use with Polish-speaking people. PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE: The Polish translation of the AAQ-24, Personal Wellbeing Index, Geriatric Depression Scale and demographic and health survey were administered to 500 older adult participants living in Poland: 269 women (53.8%) and 231 men (46.2%), aged 60 to 86 (

resultsSimilar to other translations of the AAQ, analyses confirmed a three-factor structure for the AAQ. Factor structure was confirmed as: psychosocial loss, physical change, and psychological growth. The tool was found to have good validity based on confirmatory factor analysis, as well as satisfactory latent construct reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach's α and H coefficient > .70 for all subscales). Test-retest reliability in a three-week interval was good (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged between .86 and .91,

conclusionsThe results confirm the validity and reliability of the AAQ-24-PL, and this useful tool demonstrates acceptable psychometric performance. Researchers and practitioners working with older adults can benefit from using this tool to assess losses and gains with ageing.

Indexed as

attitudes to aginghealthy agingmeasurementolder adultsquestionnairevalidation

Identifiers

PMID40041293
PMCPMC11873875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.