ArticleCase reports in perinatal medicine2023
Antenatal and histological diagnostics of cystic sacrococcygeal teratoma. Clinical case and literature review.
Article in Case reports in perinatal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of ultrasound in the prenatal diagnosis of sacrococcygeal teratoma: A case study.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The congenital embryonic tumor known as sacrococcygeal teratoma (SCT) affects 1 in 35.000-40.000 newborns and is more prevalent in female fetuses and neonates. A total of 25-50% of SCTs are diagnosed by an ultrasound (US) examination during the second trimester of pregnancy. Planning the manner of delivery, determining the risk of negative outcomes, and choosing treatment options depend on the results of antenatal differential diagnosis. Case presentation: This is a unique case of a 29-year-old second gravida, suspected of having a fetal sacrococcygeal dysplasia differentiable between Type 2 SCT and terminal myelocystocele. An MRI revealed no typical SCT changes, as a matter of course, the diagnosis of myelocystocele could not have been excluded. The results of the genetic examination allowed to exclude the chromosomal pathology. Punctuation of the external component of the formation and a cytological examination were suggested. Nevertheless, the patient and her partner refused further studies and insisted on the termination of pregnancy. Medical abortion was induced and histological findings confirmed fetal morphology to be mature SCT. Conclusions: Cystic sacrococcygeal teratoma is an unusual malformation of fetal development. In the antenatal period SCT is diagnosed based upon an ultrasound evaluation, an MRI, and a multidisciplinary assessment of clinical experts. Differential diagnosis based upon clinical imaging during the gestational period is elaborate. The final medical diagnosis needs to be verified by a histological evaluation of pathological tissue. An antenatal medical diagnosis of fetal dysplasia is considerable for the further prognosis of fetal and newborn development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.