ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
The impact of Internet-based healthcare derived from the COVID-19 pandemic on outpatients in a cardiology department.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study examines the impact of a COVID-19 pandemic-derived online medical service on cardiovascular patient visits and assesses whether these services can ease the strain on medical resources. Method: This study investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiology services and hospital operations. We analyzed key primary medical indicators in cardiology, including outpatient visits, inpatient improvement rates, cure rates, and mortality rates, over three years from 2019 to 2021. Furthermore, the study assessed the influence of the development of Internet-based medical services on the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Specifically, we compared the changes in the number of outpatient visits in four categories of offline outpatient clinics in the Department of Cardiology during two phases: Phase I (1 February 2019 to 28 February 2020) and Phase II (1 March 2020 to 28 February 2021). Results: Compared to the period before online services (T1), the second stage (T2) saw a significant decrease in total offline and general clinic visits. After the establishment of the online clinic, the third period (P3) showed a significant reduction in total offline, general, and senior clinic visits compared to the first period (P1), while vice-senior and VIP/international clinic visits increased. The number of online clinic visits and VIP/international clinic visits continued to rise. Online consultations had the highest proportion (55.9%), while prescriptions and examinations had the lowest (3.3%), although they showed a gradually increasing trend. After the implementation of the online clinic, the improvement rate of patients' conditions increased and the mortality rate decreased. Conclusion: Since the advent of online medical services, cardiovascular patients have increasingly opted for online diagnosis and treatment. Since March 2021, the online outpatient service has driven the overall growth in hospital outpatient numbers while maintaining medical quality. The primary use of the online medical service is for consultations, which shortens medical time and reduces implicit costs for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.