Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40041121›Full record

ArticleApplied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2025

ROCIP: robust continuous inertial position tracking for complex actions emerging from the interaction of human actors and environment.

Xinyu Hou, Jeroen Bergmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied intelligence (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xinyu HouDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PJ UK.
Jeroen BergmannDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PJ UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inertial navigation is advancing rapidly due to improvements in sensor technology and tracking algorithms, with consumer-grade inertial measurement units (IMUs) becoming increasingly compact and affordable. Despite progress in pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR), IMU-based positional tracking still faces significant noise and bias issues. While traditional model-based methods and recent machine learning approaches have been employed to reduce signal drift, error accumulation remains a barrier to long-term system performance. Inertial tracking's self-contained nature offers broad applicability but limits integration with a global reference frame. To solve this problem, a system that could "introspect its error" and "learn from the past" is proposed. It consists of a neural statistical motion model that regresses both poses and uncertainties with DenseNet, which are then fed into Rao-Blackwellised particle filter (RBPF) for calibration with a probabilistic transition map. An inertial tracking dataset with head-mounted IMUs was collected, including walking and running with different speeds while allowing participants to rotate their heads in a self-selected manner. The dataset consisted of 19 volunteers that generated 151 sequences in 4 scenarios with a total time of 929.8 min. It was shown that our proposed method (ROCIP) outperformed the leading methods in the field, with a relative trajectory error (RTE) of 4.94m and absolute trajectory error (ATE) of 4.36m. ROCIP could also solve the problem of error accumulation in dead reckoning and maintain a small and consistent error during long-term tracking.

Indexed as

Deep neural networkInertial measurement unitInertial navigationMachine learningPedestrian dead reckoningWearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID40041121
PMCPMC11872981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.