ArticleInternational journal of population data science2025
School-recorded special educational needs provision in children with major congenital anomalies: A linked administrative records study of births in England, 2003-2013.
Article in International journal of population data science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of special educational needs and disability provision in English primary schools using administrative health and education data in the ECHILD database.International journal of population data science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Children with major congenital anomalies (MCAs) disproportionately experience complex health problems requiring additional health and educational support. Objectives: To describe survival to the start of school and recorded special educational needs (SEN) provision among children with and without administrative record-identified MCAs in England. We present results for 12 system-specific MCA subgroups and 25 conditions. We also describe the change of prevalence in recorded SEN provision before and after SEN reforms in 2014, which were implemented to improve and streamline SEN provision. Methods: We created a birth cohort of 6,180,400 singleton children born in England between 1 September 2003 and 31 August 2013 using linked administrative records from the ECHILD database. MCAs were identified using hospital admission and mortality records during infancy. SEN provision in primary school was defined by one or more recording of SEN provision in state-school records during years 1 to 6 (ages 5/6 years to 10/11 years). Results: Children with any MCA had a 5-year survival rate of 95.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 95.0, 95.2) compared with 99.7% (95% CI 99.7, 99.7) among children without an MCA. 41.6% (75,381/181,324) of children with an MCA had any recorded SEN provision in primary school compared with 25.7% (1,285,572/5,008,598) of unaffected children. Of the 12 system-specific MCA subgroups, children with chromosomal, nervous system and eye anomalies had the highest prevalence of recorded SEN provision. The prevalence of recorded SEN provision decreased by 4.8% (99% CI -5.4, -4.3) for children with any MCA compared with a reduction of 4.2% (99% CI -4.3, -4.2) for unaffected children, when comparing pupils in year 1 before and after 2014. Conclusion: We observed that approximately two fifths of children with MCAs have some type of SEN provision recorded during primary school, but this proportion varied according to condition and declined following the 2014 SEN reforms, similar to children unaffected by MCAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.