Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40041097›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of population data science2025

Addressing uncertainty in identifying pregnancies in the English CPRD GOLD Pregnancy Register: a methodological study using a worked example.

Yangmei Li, Jennifer J Kurinczuk, Fiona Alderdice, Maria A Quigley, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Julia Sanders, Sara Kenyon, Dimitrios Siassakos, Nikesh Parekh, Suresha De Almeida and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of population data science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yangmei LiNIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom.
Jennifer J KurinczukNIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom.
Fiona AlderdiceNIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom.
Maria A QuigleyNIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom.
Oliver Rivero-AriasNIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom.
Julia SandersSchool of Healthcare Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Sara KenyonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Dimitrios SiassakosEGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nikesh ParekhPublic health and wellbeing, Royal Borough of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom.
Suresha De AlmeidaNHS South West London CCG, United Kingdom.
Claire CarsonNIHR Policy Research Unit in Maternal and Neonatal Health and Care, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Electronic health records are invaluable for pregnancy-related studies. The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Pregnancy Register (PR) identifies pregnancies in primary care records, including uncertain cases. Objectives: This paper outlines a method to reduce uncertainty in identifying pregnancies within CPRD GOLD PR data, exemplified through a study investigating the provision of pre-pregnancy care. Methods: We used CPRD Mother Baby Link (MBL) and Maternity Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) to clean and augment the CPRD PR data. The study included all women aged 18-48yrs, registered at an English GP practice within CPRD on 01/01/2017, with a year of prior registration and eligibility for hospital data linkage. We developed a cleaning and combining algorithm and further applied strict data quality criteria to form three populations: 'as provided', 'derived' (using our algorithm) and 'strictly derived' (with stricter data quality criteria). We compared characteristics and outcomes across these populations, examining potential biases in effect estimates using the 'as provided' population. Results: Our algorithm added 22,270 (~7%) pregnancies from hospital data to the CPRD PR (1997-2021), eliminated conflicting pregnancies and pregnancies with unknown outcomes, and minimised potentially non-contemporaneous records of past pregnancies or partial records of pregnancies.For all pregnancies across women's reproductive history, in the 'strictly derived' population, characterised by better data quality, a higher prevalence of pre-existing medical conditions and increased pre-pregnancy care were observed. In this dataset, recording of both exposure and outcome was better, and the magnitude of the association between exposure and outcome was reduced compared to the 'as provided' population. Conclusion: PR data requires cleaning before use. This study presents a pragmatic and practical method to identify pregnancies using existing CPRD data and linked records, without needing additional data. Researchers should carefully consider their studies' specific requirements and may adapt our proposed methodology accordingly to align with their research questions.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsRegistriesAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsData AccuracyEnglandFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyUncertaintyYoung AdultClinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)electronic health recordselectronic medical recordsHospital Episode Statistics (HES) Maternitymethodological studyMother Baby LinkpregnanciesPregnancy Registerroutine National Health Service (NHS) data

Identifiers

PMID40041097
PMCPMC11874892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.