ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Utilization of L5-S1 interbody cage in adult spinal deformity patients undergoing lumbar spinal osteotomies and spinopelvic fixation: A retrospective comparative study.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- L5 vs. pelvic fixation as the lowest instrumented vertebra in long-segment fusion for adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Spine deformity · 2026Pooled it
- Interbody cage use on successful spinal correction in pedicle subtraction osteotomy for adult spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.Spine deformity · 2026Pooled it
- Could alteration in the vacuum phenomenon rather than its presence be a sign of spinal instability?European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgeries often face complications, such as pseudoarthrosis and rod fractures (RFs), particularly at the lumbosacral junction. While transforaminal lumbosacral interbody fusion (TLIF) at L5-S1 is thought to improve outcomes, its efficacy in major ASD surgeries remains unclear. This study aims to compare clinical and radiological outcomes and implant complications in patients undergoing spinopelvic fixation with or without L5-S1 TLIF. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including 157 ASD patients who underwent high-grade osteotomies and spinopelvic fixation from 2021 to 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: those with L5-S1 TLIF (C group, Results: RFs were significantly lower in the C group (4% vs. 13%, Conclusion: The use of L5-S1 TLIF reduces RF rates, improves sagittal alignment, and clinical outcomes in ASD surgery. Incorporating TLIF at L5-S1 may optimize outcomes without increasing perioperative risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.