ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Off-label use of the pipeline embolization device for reconstruction of the extracranial internal carotid artery.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Internal carotid artery dissection (ICD) is a common cause of cerebral ischemia in adults. Medical management has been the standard of care; however, endovascular internal carotid artery (ICA) reconstruction has certain indications. The pipeline Methods: This study was a retrospective review of patients with ICD or dissecting aneurysms who underwent endovascular reconstruction at our center using PED stent implants. Patients were selected based on pre-morbid modified Rankin Scores ≤1a and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≥3 and radiologic data consistent with ICA dissection. Results: Eight patients with a mean age of 55.6 years (range: 31-82 years) and median NIHSS score of 8 (Interquartile range IQR: 2.75-16) who underwent off-label PED surgery were analyzed and are illustrated in this short series. The technical success rate was 100%, with all cases achieving reperfusions of thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grades ≥2b. Conclusion: In our series of patients with distal cervical or petrous segment ICD or dissecting aneurysms, we found the PED to be feasible, safe, and effective in achieving arterial recanalization. Further studies will clarify the role of this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.