ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Detection of suprasellar subarachnoid hemorrhage using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging during endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS) is considered safe for the treatment of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs). Postoperative subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is extremely rare in patients with PitNET, and information regarding the source of hemorrhage in such cases is limited. Case Description: Herein, we report the cases of a 59-year-old man and a 49-year-old woman who underwent ETSS for nonfunctioning PitNETs. Gentle subcapsular removal was performed, and no cerebrospinal fluid leakage was observed during the procedure. We routinely perform intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) to confirm the presence of residual tumors. In the former case, conservative treatment was selected because minimal bleeding was observed in iMRI. In the latter case, obvious arterial bleeding was observed beyond the diaphragmatic sellae before iMRI, prompting the selection of an extended transsphenoidal approach to identify the bleeding site. In both cases, iMRI revealed an SAH localized between the optic chiasm and diaphragmatic sellae adjacent to the pituitary stalk. Combined with intraoperative findings, the superior hypophyseal artery was considered the bleeding source in both cases. Hemostasis was achieved in both cases without the need for hemostatic procedures. Conclusion: SAH associated with ETSS is rare, and the source of the hemorrhage is sometimes undetectable on postoperative imaging. Herein, iMRI was useful for identifying the source and extent of the hemorrhages, allowing observation of the patients without additional intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.