ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
Advancements in occipitocervical fusion: Biomechanical insights, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes.
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluoroscopy- and Ultrasound-Guided Intra-Articular Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Atlanto-Occipital Joint for Chronic Post-Traumatic Neck Pain: A Retrospective Preliminary Case Series.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The Risk of Dysphagia After Short-Segment Posterior Occipital-C2 Fusion versus C1-C2 Cervical Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study.World neurosurgery · 2025Article
- The importance of stabilisation in enabling bone fusion demonstrated by successful revision of failed occipitocervical fusion using patient-specific atlantoaxial joint spacers: a case report.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Occipitocervical fusion (OCF) has been performed for over 70 years to address craniocervical instability caused by trauma, tumors, or congenital anomalies. Despite technological advances, challenges persist due to the unique anatomy, high mobility, and complex pathological processes at the occipitocervical junction. This study aimed to evaluate clinical, radiographic, and surgical outcomes of OCF in patients with craniocervical instability. Methods: A 2-year cohort study was conducted at Dr. Saad Alwitry's Neurosciences Hospital (April 2021- March 2023) involving 45 patients aged 17-53 (mean age 35.6). Inclusion criteria required radiologically confirmed instability, psychological fitness, and a normal coagulation profile. Patients with advanced rheumatoid arthritis or prior posterior fossa surgery were excluded. OCF procedures were performed using modern rigid instrumentation, including plates and rods, and outcomes were monitored using radiographic fusion assessments and clinical evaluations. Results: All patients achieved solid fusion (100%) within a mean of 7.06 months (range 5-9 months). Myelopathy and neurological deficits were present in all patients preoperatively, while neck pain affected 73.3%. Postoperatively, 73.3% of patients showed improvement in myelopathic symptoms, and all patients reported resolution of neck pain. Complications included one transient neurological deterioration, one wound infection, and one cerebrospinal fluid leak, all managed successfully. No operative mortalities or vascular injuries occurred. Conclusion: Rigid occipitocervical fixation stabilizes the craniocervical junction, achieving high fusion rates and symptom resolution with minimal complications. Thorough preoperative planning, precise surgical technique, and an understanding of craniocervical anatomy are crucial for optimal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.