ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2025
Printability in Multi-material Projection-Based 3-Dimensional Bioprinting.
Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling Particulate Matter-Lung Interactions from Static Models to Dynamic Lung-on-Chips.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Trabecular-Like Scaffold Dictates Osteogenesis via Fluid Shear Stress-Induced Metabolic Reprogramming through the CAV1-HIF-1α Axis.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Multimodal mechanoregulation strategies towards tissue regeneration.Mechanobiology in medicine · 2025Review
- Thermo-responsive shape memory biomaterials with structural and physical adaptivity for scarless personalized nerve repair.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Continuous Multi-Material Additive Manufacturing.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Immersion Phase Separation 3-Dimensional Printing for Strain-Stiffening Hydrogel Scaffolds.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Multichannel 3D-Printed Bioactive Scaffold Combined with Small Interfering RNA Delivery to Promote Neurological Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Engineering next-generation organoids: A review on bioprinting strategies, bioink innovations, and frontier applications.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately reconstructing the intricate structure of natural organisms is the long-standing goal of 3-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. Projection-based 3D printing boasts the highest resolution-to-manufacturing time ratio among all 3D-printing technologies, rendering it a highly promising technique in this field. However, achieving standardized, high-fidelity, and high-resolution printing of composite structures using bioinks with diverse mechanical properties remains a marked challenge. The root of this challenge lies in the long-standing neglect of multi-material printability research. Multi-material printing is far from a simple physical assembly of different materials; rather, effective control of material interfaces is a crucial factor that governs print quality. The current research gap in this area substantively hinders the widespread application and rapid development of multi-material projection-based 3D bioprinting. To bridge this critical gap, we developed a multi-material projection-based 3D bioprinter capable of simultaneous printing with 6 materials. Building upon this, we established a fundamental framework for multi-material printability research, encompassing its core logic and essential process specifications. Furthermore, we clarified several critical issues, including the cross-linking behavior of multicomponent bioinks, mechanical mismatch and interface strength in soft-hard composite structures, the penetration behavior of viscous bioinks within hydrogel polymer networks, liquid entrapment and adsorption phenomena in porous heterogeneous structures, and error source analysis along with resolution evaluation in multi-material printing. This study offers a solid theoretical foundation and guidance for the quantitative assessment of multi-material projection-based 3D bioprinting, holding promise to advance the field toward higher precision and the reconstruction of more intricate biological structures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.