ArticleNational science review2025
Reflections on DeepSeek's breakthrough.
Article in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Assessment of various artificial intelligence applications' performance in responding to multiple-choice endodontics questions.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Open-Source Large Language Models and AI Health Equity: A Health Service Triangle Model Perspective.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Three large language models demonstrate competitive performance in Traditional Chinese Medicine national medical licensing examinations over two years.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of large language models in emergency medicine scenarios: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-4o, ChatGPT-o3mini, Gemini 2.0-pro, and DeepSeek-R1.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Applying UTAUT2 model to investigate acceptance of DeepSeek by Chinese university students for academic use.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Comparative assessment of DeepSeek-R1 and GPT-4 for structured ultrasound reporting of adnexal masses.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Generative artificial intelligence in lung cancer care: current applications, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Performance of DeepSeek-R1, ChatGPT (GPT-o3-mini), and Gemini 2.0 Flash on German Medical Multiple-Choice Questions: Comparative Evaluation.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in thoracic surgery: Perspectives and challenges.Surgery in practice and science · 2025Review
- Evaluation of deepseek, gemini, ChatGPT-4o, and perplexity in responding to salivary gland cancer.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Understanding user perceptions of DeepSeek: insights from sentiment, topic and network analysis using a Reddit-based study.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Assessing DeepSeek-R1 for Clinical Decision Support in Multidisciplinary Laboratory Medicine.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- DeepSeek vs ChatGPT: a comparison study of their performance in answering prostate cancer radiotherapy questions in multiple languages.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.