ReviewBiomicrofluidics2025
Microfluidics for the biological analysis of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles: Perspectives and challenges.
Review in Biomicrofluidics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Green Algal Photobiont Diversity in Lichen Communities Under Forest Fragmentation.Environmental microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atmospheric ice-nucleating particles (INPs) make up a vanishingly small proportion of atmospheric aerosol but are key to triggering the freezing of supercooled liquid water droplets, altering the lifetime and radiative properties of clouds and having a substantial impact on weather and climate. However, INPs are notoriously difficult to model due to a lack of information on their global sources, sinks, concentrations, and activity, necessitating the development of new instrumentation for quantifying and characterizing INPs in a rapid and automated manner. Microfluidic technology has been increasingly adopted by ice nucleation research groups in recent years as a means of performing droplet freezing analysis of INPs, enabling the measurement of hundreds or thousands of droplets per experiment at temperatures down to the homogeneous freezing of water. The potential for microfluidics extends far beyond this, with an entire toolbox of bioanalytical separation and detection techniques developed over 30 years for medical applications. Such methods could easily be adapted to biological and biogenic INP analysis to revolutionize the field, for example, in the identification and quantification of ice-nucleating bacteria and fungi. Combined with miniaturized sampling techniques, we can envisage the development and deployment of microfluidic sample-to-answer platforms for automated, user-friendly sampling and analysis of biological INPs in the field that would enable a greater understanding of their global and seasonal activity. Here, we review the various components that such a platform would incorporate to highlight the feasibility, and the challenges, of such an endeavor, from sampling and droplet freezing assays to separations and bioanalysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.