Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40041008›Full record

ReviewBiomicrofluidics2025

Microfluidics for the biological analysis of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles: Perspectives and challenges.

Mark D Tarn, Kirsty J Shaw, Polly B Foster, Jon S West, Ian D Johnston, Daniel K McCluskey, Sally A Peyman, Benjamin J Murray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomicrofluidics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark D TarnSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5827-4125
Kirsty J ShawFaculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9241-4195
Jon S WestProtecting Crops and Environment Department, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5211-2405
Ian D JohnstonSchool of Physics, Engineering and Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9696-3191
Daniel K McCluskeySchool of Physics, Engineering and Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9199-938X
Benjamin J MurraySchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8198-8131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atmospheric ice-nucleating particles (INPs) make up a vanishingly small proportion of atmospheric aerosol but are key to triggering the freezing of supercooled liquid water droplets, altering the lifetime and radiative properties of clouds and having a substantial impact on weather and climate. However, INPs are notoriously difficult to model due to a lack of information on their global sources, sinks, concentrations, and activity, necessitating the development of new instrumentation for quantifying and characterizing INPs in a rapid and automated manner. Microfluidic technology has been increasingly adopted by ice nucleation research groups in recent years as a means of performing droplet freezing analysis of INPs, enabling the measurement of hundreds or thousands of droplets per experiment at temperatures down to the homogeneous freezing of water. The potential for microfluidics extends far beyond this, with an entire toolbox of bioanalytical separation and detection techniques developed over 30 years for medical applications. Such methods could easily be adapted to biological and biogenic INP analysis to revolutionize the field, for example, in the identification and quantification of ice-nucleating bacteria and fungi. Combined with miniaturized sampling techniques, we can envisage the development and deployment of microfluidic sample-to-answer platforms for automated, user-friendly sampling and analysis of biological INPs in the field that would enable a greater understanding of their global and seasonal activity. Here, we review the various components that such a platform would incorporate to highlight the feasibility, and the challenges, of such an endeavor, from sampling and droplet freezing assays to separations and bioanalysis.

Identifiers

PMID40041008
PMCPMC11878220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.