ArticleHeliyon2025
A specific model of resting-state functional brain network in MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Without any visible indicator on structure magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the diagnosis of MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy (NTLE) gets harder. By considering healthy control (HC), a specific functional connectivity (FC) model was constructed in a network topology to improve FC computation to a high-level. Methods: MRI data of 20 NTLE patients and 60 HC were pre-processed. Relative to HC, a network-level specific FC model of each network index was built to score the network functions for each NTLE patient. The specific brain areas (regarded as ROIs) were extracted for NTLE by sensitivity analysis of scores. By considering scores of specific ROIs as feature vectors to input into a SVM respectively, a specific NTLE classifier was constructed. Both 10-fold cross validation and hold-out method were utilized to validate the classification and to evaluate the effectiveness of our specific FC models. Simultaneously, the specific FC model was compared to the conventional FC model of Pearson correlation. Results: By the constructed model for specific FC at a network-level, 11 specific ROIs, such as, frontal lobe, temporal lobe, parietal lobe, hippocampus, and occipital lobe, were extracted for NTLE. Accuracy of our specific NTLE classifier could reach up nearly 93 %, over 6 % greater than conventional FC model of Pearson correlation. Conclusions: The network-level specific FC model might provide a new methodology for machine-aiding detection of functional abnormal lesions of NTLE by resting-state functional MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.