Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040969›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Exploring the relationship between neighborhood walkability and mental health: A study of urban areas in Texas.

Omar M Makram, Alan Pan, Tarang Parekh, Jay E Maddock, Bita Kash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Omar M MakramCenter for Health & Nature, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Alan PanCenter for Health Data Science and Analytics, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Tarang ParekhCenter for Health Data Science and Analytics, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Jay E MaddockCenter for Health & Nature, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Bita KashCenter for Health & Nature, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While importance of walkable neighborhoods for health is increasingly recognized, the relationship between walkability and mental health remains, especially in urban settings, unclear. This study investigated the link between walkability and mental health in urban Texas. We hypothesized that higher neighborhood walkability would correlate with lower mental health encounters. Methods: A cross-sectional study using Texas adult outpatient encounters from 2014 to 2019 supplemented by ZIP Code-level US-census socioeconomics data. Neighborhood walkability was assessed using the 2019-WalkScore (0-100) and was categorized into four groups: from completely car-dependent to very walkable/walker's paradise. Outpatient mental health encounters included depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, and stress disorders. Generalized linear models were used to assess the association between walkability and mental health, while adjusting for demographics and socioeconomics. Results: We included 55 million encounters from 751 Texas ZIP Codes (median WalkScore 28, 73 % < 65 years, 64 % women, 15 % Blacks, 16 % Hispanics, 15 % live in poverty, and 17 % without health insurance). Anxiety/stress disorders contributed to 68 % of the mental health encounters. The rate of mental health encounters was at least 3 times higher (5543 vs 1827 encounters per 100,000 population) (RR 3.03, 95%CI 1.53-6.03) in urban areas with the highest WalkScores, compared to lowest walkability neighborhoods. A similar pattern was found among depression (RR 4.8, 95%CI 2.45-9.46) and bipolar (RR 10.8, 95%CI 4.17-28.07) encounters. After adjusting for demographic and socioeconomic factors, the positive association remained significant for both depression (aRR 1.94, 95%CI 1.19-3.17) and bipolar (aRR 2.76, 95%CI 1.65-4.65) encounters, but not for total mental health encounters (aRR 1.22, 95%CI 0.76-1.96, P = 0.416). Conclusion: The study findings challenge our initial hypothesis, revealing a positive association between neighborhood walkability and various mental health encounters, emphasizing the complex intersection between urban environment and mental health. This suggests that walkability does not solely determine mental health outcomes. A deeper understanding of how demographics, socioeconomic factors, and neighborhood characteristics interact is essential to inform policies that create more equitable mentally-healthy cities.

Indexed as

Built environmentCross-sectionalDepressionMental healthStressWalkability

Identifiers

PMID40040969
PMCPMC11876897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.