ArticleHeliyon2025
Machine learning-based prediction of pervaporation permeation using physicochemical properties of permeant-membrane and process conditions.
Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is well accepted that the pervaporation (PV) permeation was affected by the physicochemical properties of permeant-membrane materials and process conditions. Given many experimental data of PV, a predictive model on PV permeation based on their physicochemical properties and process conditions can be constructed. This study proposes a machine learning approach in terms of artificial neural network (ANN) to predict the permeation flux of PV, as a function of physicochemical properties of permeant-membrane material and process conditions. A large dataset was assembled from the literature and was divided into a training subset and a testing subset. The output variable was the PV flux, while the input variables were the physicochemical properties of permeant-membrane and the process conditions which were considered to affect the PV flux. Two types of inputs were evaluated: regular variables (Type I) and dimensionless groups derived from these regular variables (Type II). Several neural network architectures were evaluated. The best predictive performance for Type I inputs was achieved with a deep neural network consisting of two layers, each with 7 neurons. For Type II inputs, the optimal architecture was a shallow neural network with a single layer containing 6 neurons. The correlation coefficients (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.