Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040965›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2025

Machine learning-based prediction of pervaporation permeation using physicochemical properties of permeant-membrane and process conditions.

Muhammad Mujiburohman, Marwen Elkamel, Farzad Hourfar, Ali Elkamel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad MujiburohmanChemical Engineering Department, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta (UMS), 57102, Indonesia.
Marwen ElkamelIndustrial Engineering & Management Systems Department, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA.
Farzad HourfarDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ali ElkamelResearch and Innovation Center on CO2 and Hydrogen (RICH Center) and Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Department, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi PO Box 127788, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well accepted that the pervaporation (PV) permeation was affected by the physicochemical properties of permeant-membrane materials and process conditions. Given many experimental data of PV, a predictive model on PV permeation based on their physicochemical properties and process conditions can be constructed. This study proposes a machine learning approach in terms of artificial neural network (ANN) to predict the permeation flux of PV, as a function of physicochemical properties of permeant-membrane material and process conditions. A large dataset was assembled from the literature and was divided into a training subset and a testing subset. The output variable was the PV flux, while the input variables were the physicochemical properties of permeant-membrane and the process conditions which were considered to affect the PV flux. Two types of inputs were evaluated: regular variables (Type I) and dimensionless groups derived from these regular variables (Type II). Several neural network architectures were evaluated. The best predictive performance for Type I inputs was achieved with a deep neural network consisting of two layers, each with 7 neurons. For Type II inputs, the optimal architecture was a shallow neural network with a single layer containing 6 neurons. The correlation coefficients (

Indexed as

Artificial neural networkMachine learningPervaporation fluxPhysicochemical propertiesProcess conditions

Identifiers

PMID40040965
PMCPMC11876881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.