Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040924›Full record

ArticleOpen research Europe2024

Microhomology-mediated end-joining Knock-In approaches to delete the allergenic domain of trout

Veronique Lebret, Cecile Duret, Amaury Herpin, Pierre-Yves Rescan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open research Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Veronique LebretLPGP Fish Physiology and Genomics, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture l'Alimentation et l'Environnement Centre Bretagne-Normandie, Rennes, Brittany, 3542, France.
Cecile DuretLPGP Fish Physiology and Genomics, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture l'Alimentation et l'Environnement Centre Bretagne-Normandie, Rennes, Brittany, 3542, France.
Amaury HerpinLPGP Fish Physiology and Genomics, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture l'Alimentation et l'Environnement Centre Bretagne-Normandie, Rennes, Brittany, 3542, France.
Pierre-Yves RescanLPGP Fish Physiology and Genomics, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture l'Alimentation et l'Environnement Centre Bretagne-Normandie, Rennes, Brittany, 3542, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4688-0977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gene editing techniques offer new opportunities to improve important traits in aquaculture. The allergenicity of fish flesh is a major problem in aquaculture. Parvalbumin (Parv) is the most prevalent fish allergen. For instance, in salmonids, a single parvalbumin beta-1 protein (parvb1) has been identified as an allergen in specific patients. Therefore, generating trout carrying two parvb1 alleles deleted from the allergenic peptide-encoding region could prevent allergies in these sensitive individuals. Methods: Here, we describe the application of the Crispr/cas9 system in an attempt to delete parvb1 exon 2 encoding the allergenic peptide and, alternatively, to replace exon 2 of parvb1 with exon2 of parvalbumin beta-2 protein (parvb2,) which does not encode the allergenic peptide. Exon skipping and swapping were pursued through microhomology-mediated end-joining (MMEJ) knock-In using specifically designed double-stranded donor DNA. Results: Genotyping of approximately 200 F0 fingerlings originating from eggs injected with donor DNA designed for exon 2 skipping led to the identification of only one animal carrying an allele lacking exon 2. Genotyping of approximately 150 fingerlings originating from eggs injected with donor DNA for exon 2 swapping did not result in any trout carrying the expected modified allele. Conclusions: These preliminary results indicate the potential difficulties associated with the MMEJ KI experiments performed in farmed fish. Finally, new genomic techniques in aquaculture are further discussed in the context of lively debates taking place in the European parliament regarding a possible revision of the current law that determines the legal status of farm animals modified by genome editing. Gene editing, microhomology-mediated end-joining knock-in, parvalbumin, allergenicity, trout, and genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

Indexed as

allergenicityGene editingGenetically modified organisms (GMOs).microhomology-mediated end joining Knock-Inparvalbumintrout

Identifiers

PMID40040924
PMCPMC11876799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.