ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Adherence to customized vestibular rehabilitation therapy: influencing factors and clinical implications in vestibulopathy.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adherence to treatment recommendations in older adults with vertigo, dizziness, and balance disorders: the MobilE-TRA 2 cohort study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Variations in the Diagnosis and Management of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo Among Physician Specialties in Saudi Arabia: Influence of Clinical Experience and Case Exposure.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Customized vestibular rehabilitation therapy (CVRT) is an effective treatment approach for various vestibular disorders. However, low adherence significantly limits its efficacy, and factors influencing adherence remain underexplored. This study aimed to identify factors affecting adherence to CVRT across major vestibulopathy categories, including acute unilateral vestibular hypofunction (AUVH), chronic unilateral vestibular hypofunction (CUVH), and bilateral vestibular hypofunction (BVH). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 90 patients who were prescribed four sessions of CVRT and underwent the therapy was conducted. Patients were classified as adherent (≥3 sessions) or non-adherent (≤2 sessions). Demographic characteristics, baseline questionnaire scores, and vestibular function test (VFT) results were compared. Change in questionnaire scores and VFT results before and after CVRT, as well as mid-treatment follow-up questionnaire scores were analyzed. Results: Adherence rates were highest in CUVH (86.7%) and lowest in BVH (46.2%). Among patients with AUVH, poor functional reach test scores were significantly associated with lower adherence ( Conclusion: Adherence to CVRT varies by vestibulopathy category and is influenced by baseline symptom severity. Tailoring CVRT strategies based on individual clinical profiles may enhance adherence and optimize therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.