Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040906›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2025

Enzymatic therapy

Weija R de Jonge, Bo Smits, Johannes C F Ket, Josje Altenburg, Jouke Annema, Johannes M A Daniels, Chris Dickhoff, Martijn van Dorp, Jerry Braun, Daniel A Korevaar and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. What is new in pleural infections?Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Weija R de JongeAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5161-8531
Bo SmitsAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9585-9943
Johannes C F KetMedical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1909-3150
Josje AltenburgAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jouke AnnemaAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes M A DanielsAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8976-9120
Chris DickhoffAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6936-8372
Martijn van DorpAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3760-3027
Jerry BraunDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4504-6235
Daniel A KorevaarAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7979-7897
David J HeinemanAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0720-7015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Parapneumonic pleural infections are frequently encountered, but the optimal treatment regimen remains controversial. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate whether immediate video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has advantages over intrapleural enzymatic therapy (IET). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science Core Collection till November 2023 and included studies comparing IET and VATS in adult patients with parapneumonic pleural infections. Primary outcome was length of hospital stay (LOS); secondary outcomes included mortality and morbidity. Study quality was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB 2. Inverse variance random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Results: We screened 2263 articles; eight were included in the final analysis, covering 1023 patients (n=465 IET (mostly single agent IET); n=558 VATS). Six were non-randomised studies (n=5 with serious risk of bias) comprising 964 patients, and two were small, randomised feasibility studies (n=1 with high risk of bias), comprising 59 patients. In the meta-analysis, LOS in non-randomised studies was shorter for patients treated by VATS (mean difference 4.2 days; 95% CI 1.5-7.0). However, no significant difference was reported in the randomised feasibility studies. Mortality and morbidity rates showed no significant difference. Interpretation: In this meta-analysis of non-randomised studies with a high risk of selection bias, VATS appears superior to IET regarding LOS in the treatment of parapneumonic pleural infections, without increased mortality and morbidity rate. Two recently published randomised feasibility studies failed to confirm this finding, but were not designed to detect a difference in LOS. This meta-analysis highlights the need for high-quality studies.

Identifiers

PMID40040906
PMCPMC11874131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.