ArticleERJ open research2025
Incidence and survival of interstitial lung diseases in the UK in 2010-2019.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lung cancer in interstitial lung disease: a matched case-control and cohort analysis.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- A systematic review of artificial intelligence-based diagnosis models for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- The incidence, mortality and complications of systemic lupus erythematosus: a population-level cohort study from 2012 to 2023.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Respiratory oscillometry identifies disease progression in interstitial lung disease.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the introduction of the antifibrotic drugs targeting progressive pulmonary fibroses, it becomes imperative to provide reliable contemporary estimates of the most common interstitial lung diseases. We aimed to provide contemporary estimates of the incidence and survival of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILDs), and to compare their survival to that of the general population. To do this we have used data extracted from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD). Methods: In this matched cohort study, we extracted incident cases of HP, CTD-ILD and IPF, and age and sex matched controls for each case, for the years 2010-2019. We calculated annual incidence rates and analysed incidence trends over time using segmented regression modelling. We estimated survival for cases and controls using the Kaplan-Meier model. Results: We extracted data for 18 914 incident cases of interstitial lung diseases between 2010 and 2019 from the OPRCD. Incidence rates varied across the different diseases, with rates of 18.12, 7.96 and 2.63 per 100 000 person-years for IPF, CTD-ILD and HP, respectively. 5-year survival for IPF, CTD-ILD and HP was 40%, 54% and 66%, respectively, and this was generally ∼50% lower than that of the general population. Conclusion: Our population-based study emphasises the considerable burden of interstitial lung diseases, with >20 000 new cases diagnosed each year in the UK, many of whom will be eligible for antifibrotic drugs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.