Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040827›Full record

ReviewExploration (Beijing, China)2025

Bioactive scaffolds for tissue engineering: A review of decellularized extracellular matrix applications and innovations.

Juan Liu, Qingru Song, Wenzhen Yin, Chen Li, Ni An, Yinpeng Le, Qi Wang, Yutian Feng, Yuelei Hu, Yunfang Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploration (Beijing, China), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Research progress and applications of biologically derived materials in scleral reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Modulating Calcium Homeostasis via a Biomimetic Scaffold to Rescue Diabetic Ischemic Wounds.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. NovoMemHistology and histopathology · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Juan LiuHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Center Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital School of Clinical Medicine Tsinghua University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1399-6719
Qingru SongClinical Translational Science Center Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital Tsinghua University Beijing China.
Wenzhen YinClinical Translational Science Center Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital Tsinghua University Beijing China.
Chen LiHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Center Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital School of Clinical Medicine Tsinghua University Beijing China.
Ni AnClinical Translational Science Center Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital Tsinghua University Beijing China.
Yinpeng LeHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Center Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital School of Clinical Medicine Tsinghua University Beijing China.
Qi WangHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Center Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital School of Clinical Medicine Tsinghua University Beijing China.
Yutian FengHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Center Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital School of Clinical Medicine Tsinghua University Beijing China.
Yuelei HuHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Center Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital School of Clinical Medicine Tsinghua University Beijing China.
Yunfang WangHepato-Pancreato-Biliary Center Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital School of Clinical Medicine Tsinghua University Beijing China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decellularized extracellular matrix (dECM) offers a three-dimensional, non-immunogenic scaffold, enriched with bioactive components, making it a suitable candidate for tissue regeneration. Although dECM-based scaffolds have been successfully implemented in preclinical and clinical settings within tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, the mechanisms of tissue remodeling and functional restoration are not fully understood. This review critically assesses the state-of-the-art in dECM scaffolds, including decellularization techniques for various tissues, quality control and cross-linking. It highlights the functional properties of dECM components and their latest applications in multiorgan tissue engineering and biomedicine. Additionally, the review addresses current challenges and limitations of decellularized scaffolds and offers perspectives on future directions in the field.

Indexed as

3D scaffoldsdecellularizationextracellular matrixnative microenvironmenttissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID40040827
PMCPMC11875452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.