Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040815›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

Trends in the burden of urolithiasis in China: an analysis from the global burden of disease study 2021.

Yangyang Lin, Qing-Cheng Lin, Qing-Ying Zhou, Nai-Fen Xu, Ding-Qin Zheng, Xin-Jun Wang, Ran Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yangyang LinDepartment of Urology, Pingyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Qing-Cheng LinDepartment of Xiaojiang, Pingyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Qing-Ying ZhouDepartment of Urology, Pingyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Nai-Fen XuDepartment of Urology, Pingyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Ding-Qin ZhengDepartment of Urology, Pingyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Xin-Jun WangDepartment of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Ran XuDepartment of Urology, Pingyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Urolithiasis is a common disease of the urinary tract, the global prevalence of which is increasing year by year and which, due to its high rate of recurrence and complications, represents a major burden on the quality of life of patients and on the global public health system. As the most populous country in the world, the epidemiology of urolithiasis in China is of great importance. However, the current systematic epidemiological assessment of urolithiasis in China is relatively limited. Therefore, this study used the GBD 2021 database to systematically assess the disease burden of urolithiasis in China to provide a basis for policy formulation. Methods: This study analysed the disease burden of urolithiasis in China between 1992 and 2021, including the number of prevalence cases, prevalence rate and age-standardised prevalence rate, using data from the GBD 2021 database. Joinpoint regression models were used to identify changes in the annual trends of urolithiasis, using annual percent change and average annual percent change for description. Age-period-cohort and Bayesian age-period-cohort models were used to assess time trends in urolithiasis burden and to predict trends over the next 15 years, respectively. Result: The age-standardised prevalence rate of urolithiasis in China has decreased from 96.23 per 100,000 in 1992 to 50.78 per 100,000 in 2021 for males and from 34.44 per 100,000 in 1992 to 22.04 per 100,000 in 2021 for females. While the number of men with the disease has declined slightly, the number of women with the disease has increased. The Joinpoint regression model showed that the age-standardised prevalence rate showed a consistent downward trend in both males and females, and that the periods in which the decline was most pronounced were very similar. The age-period-cohort model also confirmed that the period and cohort effects of urolithiasis showed a decreasing trend from year to year. In addition, the age effect suggested that the risk of urolithiasis tended to increase and then decrease with age, and that the risk was highest in the 55-59 age group. Finally, the Bayesian age-period-cohort prediction model showed that the age-standardised prevalence rate of urolithiasis in both males and females would show a slowly increasing trend over the next 15 years. Conclusion: In this study, we analysed the trend of the disease burden of urolithiasis in China during 1992-2021 by GBD 2021. The results showed that the burden of urolithiasis was significantly higher in males than in females. Furthermore, although the burden of urolithiasis has gradually improved in both men and women over the past 30 years, the BAPC prediction model suggests that the burden of urolithiasis is likely to increase in the next 15 years in both sexes. Therefore, prevention, early screening and treatment of urolithiasis in high-risk groups need to be strengthened to respond effectively to a possible future increase in burden.

Indexed as

age-period-cohort analysisglobal burden of diseaseJoinpoint regressionprevalenceurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID40040815
PMCPMC11876551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.