ArticleiScience2025
Relative social status alters the synchrony of attribute integration in altruistic decisions.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social status, which represents the relative dominance structure in societies, forms the backdrop against which most social decisions are made. Effective social decision-making demands flexible integration of decision attribute weight (importance of an attribute) and attribute latency (when attributes start to affect decisions). However, current understanding of how attribute weight and latency are influenced by relative social status is limited. In three experiments, we dynamically manipulated subjects' relative social status before they engaged in an altruistic decision task and found that their altruistic behavior was better explained by a time-varying drift diffusion model, in which relative social status selectively modulated attribute latency but not attribute weights. Furthermore, prosocial subjects exhibited higher sensitivity to attribute latency in response to changes in relative social status compared with individualistic subjects. Our results introduce a new dimension to the computational mechanisms underlying the intricate interplay between relative social status and attribute integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.