ArticleThe Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique2025
Variable selection in modelling clustered data via within-cluster resampling.
Article in The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In many biomedical applications, there is a need to build risk-adjustment models based on clustered data. However, methods for variable selection that are applicable to clustered discrete data settings with a large number of candidate variables and potentially large cluster sizes are lacking. We develop a new variable selection approach that combines within-cluster resampling techniques with penalized likelihood methods to select variables for high-dimensional clustered data. We derive an upper bound on the expected number of falsely selected variables, demonstrate the oracle properties of the proposed method, and evaluate the finite sample performance of the method through extensive simulations. We illustrate the proposed approach using a colon surgical site infection data set consisting of 39,468 individuals from 149 hospitals to build risk-adjustment models that account for both the main effects of various risk factors and their two-way interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.