ReviewNeurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.)
Critical reflections on medication overuse headache in patients with migraine: An unsolved riddle in nociception.
Review in Neurobiology of pain (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies Versus Topiramate for Migraine Prophylaxis: Six-Month, Real-World, Intention-to-Treat Retrospective Evidence from the GRASP Study Group.Neurology international · 2026Article
- Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness versus vestibular migraine: A narrative review.Headache · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Migraine chronification very frequently exposes patients to the inevitable risk of excessive symptomatic intake that, in turn, prompts development of medication overuse headache (MOH). The latter further compromises headache severity establishing a vicious cycle of symptomatic intake and relapsing head pain that critically worsens the overall clinical status of patients. A great deal of attention has been focused on MOH pathogenesis, and thanks to preclinical and clinical studies knowledge about this disorder is now remarkably advanced. Still, some open questions remain regarding issues related to the neurobiology and neurochemistry underpinning pain chronification in MOH patients, as well as the remedies capable of interrupting pronociceptive cephalic sensitization and drug overuse. Here, a critical reappraisal of these issues is provided in an attempt to gain deeper insight and promote debate on a pain disorder that still represents a conundrum in the field of nociception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.