Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040727›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Identification of benign and malignant breast nodules on ultrasound: comparison of multiple deep learning models and model interpretation.

Xi Wen, Hao Tu, Bingyang Zhao, Wenbo Zhou, Zhuo Yang, Lijuan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xi WenDepartment of Ultrasound, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia And Miao Autonomous Prefecture (Enshi Clinical College of Wuhan University), Enshi, China.
Hao TuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia And Miao Autonomous Prefecture (Enshi Clinical College of Wuhan University), Enshi, China.
Bingyang ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Wenbo ZhouDepartment of Stomatology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Zhuo YangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia And Miao Autonomous Prefecture (Enshi Clinical College of Wuhan University), Enshi, China.
Lijuan LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia And Miao Autonomous Prefecture (Enshi Clinical College of Wuhan University), Enshi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Deep learning (DL) algorithms generally require full supervision of annotating the region of interest (ROI), a process that is both labor-intensive and susceptible to bias. We aimed to develop a weakly supervised algorithm to differentiate between benign and malignant breast tumors in ultrasound images without image annotation. Methods: We developed and validated the models using two publicly available datasets: breast ultrasound image (BUSI) and GDPH&SYSUCC breast ultrasound datasets. After removing the poor quality images, a total of 3049 images were included, divided into two classes: benign (N = 1320 images) and malignant (N = 1729 images). Weakly-supervised DL algorithms were implemented with four networks (DenseNet121, ResNet50, EffientNetb0, and Vision Transformer) and trained using 2136 unannotated breast ultrasound images. 609 and 304 images were used for validation and test sets, respectively. Diagnostic performances were calculated as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Using the class activation map to interpret the prediction results of weakly supervised DL algorithms. Results: The DenseNet121 model, utilizing complete image inputs without ROI annotations, demonstrated superior diagnostic performance in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast nodules when compared to ResNet50, EfficientNetb0, and Vision Transformer models. DenseNet121 achieved the highest AUC, with values of 0.94 on the validation set and 0.93 on the test set, significantly surpassing the performance of the other models across both datasets (all P < 0.05). Conclusion: The weakly supervised DenseNet121 model developed in this study demonstrated feasibility for ultrasound diagnosis of breast tumor and showed good capabilities in differential diagnosis. This model may help radiologists, especially novice doctors, to improve the accuracy of breast tumor diagnosis using ultrasound.

Indexed as

breast tumordiagnosisinterpretabilityultrasonographyweakly supervised deep learning

Identifiers

PMID40040727
PMCPMC11876547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.