Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040689›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Sound of Relief or a Sound of Panic: A Case Report on Female Urethral Sounding.

Grace Kuroki, Zachariah Taylor, Max Ahn

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Grace KurokiUrology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Zachariah TaylorUrology, Main Line Health, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, USA.
Max AhnUrology, Main Line Health, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical urethral sounding is a common practice used to dilate the urethra. However, recreational practice comes with additional risks and perceived social stigma. This article describes a case of a middle-aged female patient inserting a 12-cm sounding device into her urethra during sexual intercourse with her partner that became lodged in her bladder. After bedside cystoscopy failed, she needed to be taken to the operating room for surgical removal. We discuss the medical complications of insertion, in both the male and female urethras, in addition to commentary on the threat that delay in treatment poses to the individuals. Safe recreational sounding practices are mentioned to best prepare the patient and physician for these situations.

Indexed as

dangerous sexual practicesfemale urethral dilatationforeign body insertionforeign body removalsounding

Identifiers

PMID40040689
PMCPMC11876709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.