ArticleJournal of applied statistics2025
Framework for constructing an optimal weighted score based on agreement.
Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In many medical studies, questionnaires or instruments with item ratings are often used to measure the health outcomes reflecting the disease status. Therefore, combining these item ratings to derive a score that reflects the disease status is an important issue. This paper proposes a new weighted method with the weights determined by maximizing the broad sense agreement Peng et al. [L. Peng, R. Li, Y. Guo, and A. Manatunga, A framework for assessing broad sense agreement between ordinal and continuous measurements, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 106 (2011), pp. 1592-1601.] between the new score and the disease status measured by an ordinal scale. Theoretical and simulation results demonstrate the validity of our proposed optimal weights. We illustrate our method via an application to a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.