Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040640›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Standard b-value DWI-derived stiffness index analysis may provide a way to evaluate the development of intracerebral hematoma.

Qian Li, Jin Mao, Qiyuan Wang, Liding Yao, Fangfang Xu, Fei Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qian Li *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jin Mao *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qiyuan WangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Liding YaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Fangfang XuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Fei DongDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: The development of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is closely related to mechanical forces. However, noninvasively evaluating mechanical forces for ICH patients in the current clinical setting is challenging. In this study, we aimed to build an easily accessible stiffness index (STI) and evaluate the stiffness of the perihematomal edema (PHE) region in ICH patients. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, two cohorts of 57 patients were included. One cohort (the exploratory cohort) comprised patients with both standard b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (sDWI) (b-values of 0 and 1,000 s/mm Results: The STI could be calculated with the Equation 0.047697*S1000-0.022944*S0 + 5.359883, where S1000 and S0 represent the signal intensities of the b1000 and b0 images, respectively. In the whole and largest-slice PHE regions, both the mSTI and COV were correlated with the hematoma volume ( Conclusion: The standard b-value DWI-derived stiffness index analysis may provide a noninvasive and easily accessible way to evaluate the development of ICH.

Indexed as

cerebral hemorrhagediffusion magnetic resonance imagingelasticity imaging techniquesmagnetic resonance elastographyshear modulusstiffness index

Identifiers

PMID40040640
PMCPMC11876965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.