Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040619›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American Heart Association2025

International Consensus on Evidence Gaps and Research Opportunities in Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Refractory Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Report From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop.

Laurie J Morrison, Elizabeth A Hunt, Brian Grunau, Thomas P Aufderheide, Clifton Callaway, Joseph E Tonna, Comilla Sasson, Audrey Blewer, Bryan F McNally, Demetris Yannopoulos and 11 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Laurie J MorrisonEmergency Medicine, Medicine University of Toronto, Emergency Services, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8369-9774
Elizabeth A HuntAnesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine and Pediatrics Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0053-6265
Brian GrunauDepartment of Emergency Medicine St. Paul's Hospital, and the University of British Columbia (BC), Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes Vancouver BC Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4103-1383
Thomas P AufderheideEmergency Medicine Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee WI USA.
Clifton CallawayEmergency Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA USA.
Joseph E TonnaCardiothoracic Critical Care, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Department of Surgery and Department of Emergency Medicine University of Utah Health Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8879-2628
Comilla SassonAmerican Heart Association Dallas TX USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9922-6637
Audrey BlewerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health and Population Health Sciences Duke University School of Medicine Durham NC USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2830-5191
Bryan F McNallyEmergency Medicine Emory University Atlanta GA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3532-1931
Demetris YannopoulosCardiology University of Minnesota, Minnesota Resuscitation Consortium Minneapolis MN USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7131-2015
Jan BelohlavekDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Cardiovascular Medicine General University Hospital and 1st Medical School, Charles University Prague Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9455-9224
Jason BartosCardiology University of Minnesota, Minnesota Resuscitation Consortium Minneapolis MN USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0113-5305
Alain CombesIntensive Care Medicine Sorbonne Université, APHP, La Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital Paris France.ORCID 0000-0002-6030-3957
Ahamed IdrisSurgery and Emergency Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7113-6499
Raina M MerchantEmergency Medicine, Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Center for Digital Health University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA USA.
Leith StatesOffice of Science and Medicine Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH) Washington DC USA.
Emily TinsleyDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences NHLBI, NIH Bethesda MD USA.
Renee WongDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences NHLBI, NIH Bethesda MD USA.ORCID 0009-0000-5825-4642
Scott T YoungquistEmergency Medicine University of Utah Medical Center Salt Lake City UT USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2343-9521
George SopkoDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences NHLBI, NIH Bethesda MD USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5482-8992
Karl B KernCardiology, Sarver Heart Center University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8334-8189

Funding

Advanced REperfusion STrategies- The ARREST TrialR33HL142696 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI AUFDERHEIDE, TOM PAUL, YANNOPOULOS, DEMETRIS · 2019 to 2020
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL142696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increased accessibility of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation following the COVID-19 pandemic and the publication of the first randomized trial of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) prompted the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to sponsor a workshop on ECPR. Two more randomized trials have since been published in 2022 and 2023. Based on the combined findings and review of the evidence, an international panel of authors identified gaps in science, inequities in care and diversity in outcomes, and suggested research opportunities and next steps. The science pertaining to ECPR would benefit from the United States contributing uniform data to existing registries and sharing common data with the ELSO (Extracorporeal Life Support Organization) international registry to increase the sample size for observational research. In addition, well-designed efficacy trials, recruiting across different regions of care evaluating long-term follow-up, including patient reported outcomes, cost effectiveness, and equity measures, would contribute significantly to the body of science. Workshop participants defined the population of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest most likely to benefit from ECPR. ECPR-eligible patients include those aged 18 to 75 years functioning independently without comorbidity; before suffering a witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and without any obvious cause of the cardiac arrest; presenting in a shockable rhythm and transported with mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation to an ECPR-capable institute within 30 minutes, which is recommended after 3 rounds of advanced life support treatment without return of spontaneous circulation. There are significant inequities in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest care that need to be addressed such that outcomes are optimized for each target region before implementing ECPR in a clinical or implementation trial.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationCOVID-19Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestEvidence GapsHumansNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.)SARS-CoV-2United Statesconsensusevidence gapsextracorporeal membrane oxygenationout‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest

Identifiers

PMID40040619
PMCPMC12132745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.