Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040566›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in organ transplantation2025

Psychosocial information sharing to improve equity in kidney transplant evaluation.

Adam S Wilk, Anne M Huml, Megan Urbanski, Dorothy Muench, Kristen M Fischer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in organ transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adam S WilkDepartment of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine.
Anne M HumlDepartment of Kidney Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Megan UrbanskiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Emory University School of Medicine.
Dorothy MuenchAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Kristen M FischerSanford Health, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.

Funding

Multi-level Factors that Influence Dialysis Facilities' Assessments of Patient Suitability for TransplantationK01DK128384 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI WILK, ADAM STEVEN · 2021 to 2025
$744k
NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK128384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIncreasing transplant access overall and particularly among historically underserved and marginalized patient groups is a shared goal nationwide. Patient challenges with psychosocial factors, such as social support and health literacy, are recognized as among the top reasons patients may not be referred, evaluated, or waitlisted, key steps along the pathway to transplantation. Yet referring providers' (e.g., dialysis clinics') and transplant centers' processes for measuring, communicating about, and addressing patients' psychosocial challenges are inconsistent, can emphasize measures more relevant to dialysis care than transplant care, and are highly susceptible to implicit bias. RECENT

findingsIn this article, we illuminate the opportunity to standardize the patient psychosocial information that dialysis clinics and other nephrology care providers share with the transplant center when referring a patient for transplant evaluation. We highlight potential benefits and trade-offs to this approach and describe how regional coalitions comprising patients, caregivers, and community members can support developing and implementing a standardized template for this purpose, as well as the objectives that the coalition's efforts should pursue to this end. SUMMARY: Standardized templates for psychosocial information sharing at referral represent a key opportunity to improve quality, efficiency, and equity in pretransplant care as well as transplant access outcomes broadly.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth EquityInformation DisseminationKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPatient SelectionReferral and ConsultationSocial SupportWaiting Lists

Identifiers

PMID40040566
PMCPMC11885882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.