Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040502›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2025

High-resolution proteomic analysis of medulloblastoma clinical samples identifies therapy-resistant subgroups and MYC immunohistochemistry as a powerful outcome predictor.

Alberto Delaidelli, Fares Burwag, Susana Ben-Neriah, Yujin Suk, Taras Shyp, Suzanne Kosteniuk, Christopher Dunham, Sylvia Cheng, Konstantin Okonechnikov, Daniel Schrimpf and 11 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Alberto DelaidelliDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Fares BurwagDepartment of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Susana Ben-NeriahCentre for Lymphoid Cancer, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Yujin SukDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Taras ShypDepartment of Molecular Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Suzanne KosteniukDepartment of Pathology, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Christopher DunhamDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Children's and Women's Health Centre of British Columbia, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6244-0584
Sylvia ChengDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology/BMT, Department of Pediatrics, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Konstantin OkonechnikovHopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Daniel SchrimpfDepartment of Neuropathology of Heidelberg University and CCU Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas von DeimlingDepartment of Neuropathology of Heidelberg University and CCU Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5863-540X
Benjamin EllezamDivision of Pathology, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Sébastien PerreaultDepartment of Neurosciences, Division of Child Neurology, CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Sheila SinghDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Cynthia HawkinsDivision of Pathology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2618-4402
Marcel KoolUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Stefan M PfisterDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital, and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Christian SteidlCentre for Lymphoid Cancer, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Christopher HughesDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Andrey KorshunovDepartment of Neuropathology of Heidelberg University and CCU Neuropathology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Poul H SorensenDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

EPICC 968281Terry Fox Research Institute 1108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile international consensus and the 2021 WHO classification recognize multiple molecular medulloblastoma subgroups, these are difficult to identify in clinical practice utilizing routine approaches. As a result, biology-driven risk stratification and therapy assignment for medulloblastoma remains a major clinical challenge. Here, we report mass spectrometry-based analysis of clinical samples for medulloblastoma subgroup discovery, highlighting a MYC-driven prognostic signature and MYC immunohistochemistry (IHC) as a clinically tractable method for improved risk stratification.

methodsWe analyzed 56 formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) medulloblastoma samples by data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry identifying a MYC proteome signature in therapy-resistant group 3 medulloblastoma. We validated MYC IHC prognostic and predictive value across 2 groups of 3/4 medulloblastoma clinical cohorts (n = 362) treated with standard therapies.

resultsAfter the exclusion of WNT tumors, MYC IHC was an independent predictor of therapy resistance and death [HRs 23.6 and 3.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-536.18 and 1.84-5.66; P = .047 and <.001]. Notably, only ~50% of the MYC IHC-positive tumors harbored MYC amplification. Accordingly, cross-validated survival models incorporating MYC IHC outperformed current risk stratification schemes including MYC amplification, and reclassified ~20% of patients into a more appropriate very high-risk category.

conclusionsThis study provides a high-resolution proteomic dataset that can be used as a reference for future biomarker discovery. Biology-driven clinical trials should consider MYC IHC status in their design. Integration of MYC IHC in classification algorithms for non-WNT tumors could be rapidly adopted on a global scale, independently of advanced but technically challenging molecular profiling techniques.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCerebellar NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmMedulloblastomaProteomicsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunohistochemistryMalePrognosisBiomarkers, TumorMYC protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycbiomarkerFFPE proteomicsMedulloblastomaMYCrisk-stratification

Identifiers

PMID40040502
PMCPMC12526081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.