ArticleInternational wound journal2025
Creation of a National Chronic Wound Registry-Challenges and Opportunities.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering in vitro models to replicate the complexity of chronic wounds.Nature communications · 2026Review
- TLR4-paxillin-Rac1 signaling mediates LPS-induced dysregulation of keratinocyte function.iScience · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of ON101 with general wound care for diabetic foot ulcers among patients with type 2 diabetes in Singapore: Analysis of a multi-ethnic country in Asia.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic wounds pose an increasing burden on the healthcare system and data on wound outcomes and are needed to evaluate and address disparities and reform healthcare policies. In Singapore, data on chronic wounds are fragmented and to address this, we established a Chronic Wounds Registry (CWR) to collect harmonised data on chronic wounds and their outcomes over 6 months. This is a multi-centre prospective cohort study from Nov 2019 to Nov 2021. Patients with chronic wounds were enrolled at multi-speciality acute care hospitals and data were prospectively collected on baseline characteristics, including subject demographics, clinical data, wound images, interventions/treatment, cost burden and patient reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Patients were followed up for 6 months and wound outcomes recorded at Month 1, Month 3 and Month 6 time points. Despite the onset of COVID pandemic, a total of 812 patients were recruited in our study. Mean age was 63.5 ± 11.6 years with 66% men and 59% of Chinese ethnicity. Twenty percent of all the wounds were recurrent and patients with venous leg ulcers (VLU) (32%) had the highest recurrence. At 6 months, 225 (46%) of the neuro-ischemic ulcers (NIU), 152 (60%) of the VLUs and 29 (46%) of the pressure injuries (PI) had healed. Major (5%) amputations were highest in patients with NIUs. All-cause mortality was highest (30%) and HRQOL was lowest for patients with PIs (-0.18). Development of a national wound registry is both feasible and essential to consolidate key data elements on chronic wounds. The CWR in its current state captured the local epidemiology, patient journey in acute care hospitals, which will benefit in healthcare policymaking and harmonise care across different levels of healthcare system. The next phase of the CWR aims to track patients in all settings and collect data on the entire patient journey following an episode of wounding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.