Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040330›Full record

ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2025

Pop-off mechanisms in fetal megacystis: extravasation, umbilical cord cyst, ureterocele and megaureter.

L A M Brinkman, L K Duin, P N Adama van Scheltema, T E Cohen-Overbeek, E Pajkrt, M N Bekker, C Willekes, E J T Verweij, C Bilardo, F Fontanella

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

L A M BrinkmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-0789-7329
L K DuinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4089-9973
P N Adama van ScheltemaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Prenatal Diagnosis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
T E Cohen-OverbeekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Fetal Medicine, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9949-1476
E PajkrtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M N BekkerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Prenatal Diagnosis, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7372-4291
C WillekesDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Prenatal Diagnosis, University Medical Center, Grow School for Oncology and Medical Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
E J T VerweijDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Prenatal Diagnosis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
C BilardoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1894-0626
F FontanellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze comprehensively the incidence, antenatal ultrasound characteristics and prognostic implications of antenatal pop-off mechanisms of the fetal urinary system in pregnancies with suspected fetal megacystis.

methodsThis was a retrospective multicenter study of pregnancies with suspected fetal megacystis conducted across all academic hospitals in The Netherlands. Three antenatal pop-off mechanisms were identified: presence of an umbilical cord cyst (UCC), extravasation of urine into the intraperitoneal space (ascites) or perirenal subcapsular (urinoma), and megaureter/ureterocele. Cases that exhibited two different pop-off mechanisms, underwent vesicoamniotic shunt placement or had unclear information regarding shunt placement were excluded. We compared the antenatal ultrasound characteristics and outcomes among pregnancies with UCC, those with extravasation, those with megaureter/ureterocele and those without a pop-off mechanism. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of pop-off mechanisms with antenatal characteristics and postnatal outcomes.

resultsAmong 543 fetuses with suspected megacystis, 76% exhibited no pop-off mechanism, 7% presented with UCC only, 9% presented with extravasation only, 7% presented with a megaureter/ureterocele only and 1% presented with two pop-off mechanisms. Following exclusions, 511 cases were included in the analysis. The identification of UCC (n = 39) was associated with early-onset megacystis (odds ratio (OR), 4.2 (95% CI, 1.9-9.1); P < 0.001), severe megacystis (OR 2.3 (95% CI, 1.1-5.0); P = 0.033), normal amniotic fluid index (AFI) (OR, 3.3 (95% CI, 1.3-8.2); P = 0.011) and additional associated anomaly (OR, 3.3 (95% CI, 1.7-6.4); P < 0.001), and thus with the highest prevalence of complex diagnosis (66%), primarily represented by anorectal malformation. Extravasation (n = 42) was associated with severe megacystis (OR, 2.4 (95% CI, 1.1-5.4); P = 0.030), abnormal AFI (OR, 2.8 (95% CI, 1.2-6.8); P = 0.022), the keyhole sign (OR, 2.5 (95% CI, 1.1-5.8); P = 0.033) and additional associated anomaly (OR, 2.1 (95% CI, 1.1-4.1); P = 0.026). Megaureter/ureterocele (n = 36) was associated with late-onset megacystis (OR, 4.0 (95% CI, 1.6-9.7); P = 0.003), a thickened bladder wall during pregnancy (OR, 6.6 (95% CI, 1.9-23.1); P = 0.003) and the lowest prevalence of additional associated anomaly (22%). Intrauterine fetal demise was most prevalent in fetuses with UCC (15%), while termination of pregnancy and non-survivors were most common in cases with extravasation (50% and 17%, respectively). The majority of fetuses with megacystis associated with megaureter/ureterocele were still alive during follow-up (72%) and the odds of survival were the highest for this group (OR, 2.7 (95% CI, 1.3-5.7); P = 0.010).

conclusionsAntenatal pop-off mechanisms may alleviate high intraluminal pressure within the fetal urinary tract. Each mechanism leads to a different antenatal clinical picture and outcome, which may explain partially the heterogeneity of outcomes in fetuses with megacystis. Therefore, understanding the implications of these mechanisms and their antenatal characteristics could guide antenatal counseling and management of fetal megacystis. © 2025 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

CystsFetal DiseasesUrachal CystUreterUreteroceleUrinary BladderAdultDuodenumFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornNetherlandsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, PrenatalUmbilical Cordantenatal diagnosislower urinary tract obstructionLUTOrenal functionultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40040330
PMCPMC11961101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.