SynthesisCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2025
Postmarketing Assessment of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: Proof-of-Concept Using Model-Based Meta-Analysis and a Clinical Utility Index Approach.
Synthesis in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current State-of-the-Art and Future Advancements of Model-Based Meta-Analysis.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy: current landscape, challenges, and future directions.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- The Advance of In Silico Evidence to Transform Pediatric Drug Development for Rare Diseases.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are a promising class of targeted cancer therapies. However, they need careful dose optimization to maximize effectiveness and minimize side effects. Sometimes, safety issues may only become apparent after approval, so ongoing evaluation is important. This study aimed to assess the benefit-risk profiles of two approved trastuzumab-drug conjugates: trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). A systematic search of MEDLINE on May 1, 2024, identified clinical trials reporting the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and efficacy of T-DM1 and T-DXd. Summary-level data from 103 trials was used along with model-based meta-analysis to develop population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response models for both ADCs. The study combined the objective response rate (ORR) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) into a composite score called the clinical utility index (CUI) to determine optimal drug exposures and doses that maximize the benefit-risk balance. Different ORR/DLT weights and CUI thresholds representing desired minimum effect size were tested in three scenarios ("only phase I trials," "phase I/II trials," and "all phases"). Using a CUI threshold of 10%, the approved T-DM1 dose of 3.6 mg/kg for breast cancer was found to align with an efficacy-safety (ORR-DLT) ratio of 81:19 with all phases. Applying these weights to the T-DXd analyses successfully predicted the approved T-DXd dose (5.4 mg/kg, breast cancer), showing a CUI improvement compared to the 3.2 mg/kg dose of 8.3%, 8.2%, and 2.4% in the three respective scenarios. Overall, this proof-of-concept assessment of ADCs can save time and costs for pharmaceutical companies and optimize dosing to maximize patient benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.