ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2025
The validation of a simple and instrument-free technique to measure the depth of the natal cleft (a cohort study).
Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The validation of a simple and instrument-free technique to measure the depth of the natal cleft (a cohort study).Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimPilonidal disease is a benign condition mainly affecting the young population. In recent literature, the depth of the natal cleft is thought to impact postoperative outcomes including wound complications and rate of recurrence. Currently there is no agreed method for measuring the depth of the natal cleft; this study proposes a novel and instrument-free technique that can be used as a research tool to measure the depth.
methodThis is a single centre study performed at St Mark's Hospital in London, with 63 participants volunteering to take part. Blinded repeated measurements of the natal cleft were taken by two separate clinicians to assess for inter-observer and intra-observer variation.
resultsAgreement was measured and assessed by the Bland-Altman limits of agreement method and intra-class correlation (ICC). The mean difference between repeat measurements for both inter-observer and intra-observer were close to zero (-0.06 and -0.11 respectively). ICC analysis suggested a value of 0.91 for inter-observer agreement, signifying very good agreement between clinicians. Moderate intra-observer agreement was observed, with an ICC value of 0.74.
conclusionThis study offers an alternative simple validated technique to measure the depth of the natal cleft, with good observer agreement. We propose that future studies aiming to analyse the depth of the natal cleft and its relationship with severity and postoperative outcomes use this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.