ArticleAdvanced biology2025
3D Mechanical Confinement Directs Muscle Stem Cell Fate and Function.
Article in Advanced biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nuclear mechanotransduction: tools for mechanical perturbation and chromatin characterization.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2026Review
- The Primary Cilium: A New Player in Muscle Stem Cell Biology.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Mechanical Signaling Regulates DNA Methylation to Maintain Muscle Stem Cell Quiescence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mechanobiological landscape of muscle stem cells.Skeletal muscle · 2026Review
- A customizable, low-cost 3D-printed device for live cell confinement imaging.Lab on a chip · 2026Article
- Collagen Scaffold Viscoelasticity Regulates Muscle Cell Phenotype.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- 3D Mechanical Confinement Directs Muscle Stem Cell Fate and Function.Advanced biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Muscle stem cells (MuSCs) play a crucial role in skeletal muscle regeneration, residing in a niche that undergoes dimensional and mechanical changes throughout the regeneration process. This study investigates how 3D confinement and stiffness encountered by MuSCs during the later stages of regeneration regulate their function, including stemness, activation, proliferation, and differentiation. An asymmetric 3D hydrogel bilayer platform is engineered with tunable physical constraints to mimic the regenerating MuSC niche. These results demonstrate that increased 3D confinement maintains Pax7 expression, reduces MuSC activation and proliferation, inhibits differentiation, and is associated with smaller nuclear size and decreased H4K16ac levels, suggesting that mechanical confinement modulates both nuclear architecture and epigenetic regulation. MuSCs in unconfined 2D environments exhibit larger nuclei and higher H4K16ac expression compared to those in more confined 3D conditions, leading to progressive activation, expansion, and myogenic commitment. This study highlights the importance of 3D mechanical cues in MuSC fate regulation, with 3D confinement acting as a mechanical brake on myogenic commitment, offering novel insights into the mechano-epigenetic mechanisms that govern MuSC behavior during muscle regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.