ArticleBiophysical journal2025
Auditory cellular cooperativity probed via spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Time-Domain Model for the Generation of Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions in Resonant Cavities.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2026Article
- How Exceptional Is the Ear?Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a sound pressure detector that uses energy to boost both its sensitivity and selectivity, the inner ear is an active nonequilibrium system. The collective processes of the inner ear that give rise to this exquisite functionality remain poorly understood. One manifestation of the active ear across the animal kingdom is the presence of spontaneous otoacoustic emission (SOAE), idiosyncratic arrays of spectral peaks that can be measured using a sensitive microphone in the ear canal. Current SOAE models attempt to explain how multiple peaks arise, and generally assume a spatially distributed tonotopic system. However, the nature of the generators, their coupling, and the role of noise (e.g., Brownian motion) are hotly debated, especially given the inner ear morphological diversity across vertebrates. One means of probing these facets of emission generation is studying fluctuations in SOAE peak properties, which produce amplitude and frequency modulations (AM and FM, respectively). These properties are likely related to the presence of noise affecting active cellular generation elements, and the coupling between generators. To better biophysically constrain models, this study characterizes the fluctuations in filtered SOAE peak waveforms, focusing on interrelations within and across peaks. A systematic approach is taken, examining three species that exhibit disparate inner ear morphologies: humans, barn owls, and green anole lizards. To varying degrees across all three groups, SOAE peaks have intrapeak (IrP) and interpeak (IPP) correlations indicative of interactions between generative elements. Activity from anole lizards, whose auditory sensory organ is relatively much smaller than that of humans or barn owls, showed a much higher incidence of nearest-neighbor IPP correlations. We propose that these data reveal characteristics of SOAE cellular generators acting cooperatively, allowing the ear to function as an optimized detector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.