Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040034›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2024

3-Dimensional Vibrotactile Feedback Training Promotes Positive User Experience and Improvement in Reach-to-Grasp Kinematics.

Rachel N Mazorow, Kimberly D Bassindale, Robert A Scheidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachel N Mazorow
Kimberly D Bassindale
Robert A Scheidt

Funding

Augmenting kinesthetic feedback to improve hemiparetic arm control after strokeR15HD093086 · NICHD · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHEIDT, ROBERT A. · 2017 to 2021
$897k
NICHD NIH HHS R15 HD093086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately half of stroke survivors experience a decrease in upper extremity motor control related to decreased proprioceptive abilities. This study continues efforts to use sensory augmentation to address proprioceptive deficits experienced post-stroke. Previous studies using 1- and 2-dimensional supplemental vibrotactile feedback have successfully improved the accuracy of reaching movements performed without concurrent vision. This proof-of-concept study aimed to assess the extent to which multi-session training with 3-dimensional vibrotactile feedback might lead to post-training kinematic improvements compared to proprioception-only for healthy young adults. After training, results showed an increase in movement accuracy with a concomitant decrease in movement speed. Participants reported positive satisfaction with vibrotactile feedback and intrinsic motivation to use the device, with acceptable scores for device usability. This study is a promising step towards developing an assistive device for real-world reach-to-grasp tasks for those with sensorimotor deficits.

Indexed as

Feedback, SensoryHand StrengthTouchVibrationAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleStroke RehabilitationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40040034
PMCPMC12535732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.