Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40040029›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2024

An Algorithmic Approach for Detecting Neuromotor Developmental Disabilities in Infants from Wearable Sensor Data.

Maria Despoina Siampou, Luciano Nocera, Jinseok Oh, Beth A Smith, Cyrus Shahabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Despoina Siampou
Luciano Nocera
Jinseok Oh
Beth A Smith
Cyrus Shahabi

Funding

Rehabilitation Research Career Development ProgramK12HD055929 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI BROWN, DAVID A · 2007 to 2021
$11.7M
SCH: Wearables for Health and Disease Knowledge (W4H)R01LM014026 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI SHAHABI, CYRUS · 2022 to 2025
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055929NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inherent challenges in recruiting human subjects, particularly infants, often hinder the acquisition of sufficiently large datasets for health research, thereby limiting the applicability of conventional machine-learning (ML) approaches. In this study, we analyze full-day motion recordings from two groups: typically developing infants (N = 12) and infants at risk for developmental disabilities (N = 24), further divided into those with good (N = 10) and poor (N = 9) developmental outcomes at 24 months. The goal is to differentiate at-risk (AR) infants from those with typical development (TD) and predict outcomes for the at-risk category using wearable data. Due to its limited size, previous studies on this dataset, employing statistical and machine learning methods, raise reliability concerns. To address this, we introduce a novel algorithmic approach to extract meaningful patterns, referred to as Motifs, from the raw signals. The abundance of Motifs serves as highly informative indicators, enabling effective differentiation between the groups. Evaluation on this limited-size dataset demonstrates the effectiveness of Motifs in distinguishing AR from TD infants and predicting future outcomes for the at-risk category.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDevelopmental DisabilitiesWearable Electronic DevicesFemaleHumansInfantMachine LearningMaleReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID40040029
PMCPMC11883186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.