Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40039510›Full record

ArticleAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference2024

Multidimensional feature analysis shows stratification in robotic-motor-training gains based on the level of pre-training motor impairment in stroke.

Sebastian Rueda Parra, Joel C Perry, Eric T Wolbrecht, David J Reinkensmeyer, Disha Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sebastian Rueda Parra
Joel C Perry
Eric T Wolbrecht
David J Reinkensmeyer
Disha Gupta

Funding

Training and DisseminationP41EB018783 · NIBIB · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI Theresa M. Vaughan · 2014 to 2026
$15.4M
EFFECTIVENESS OF ROBOT-ASSISTED HAND MOVEMENT TRAINING AFTER STROKER01HD062744 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI David Jay Reinkensmeyer · 2010 to 2026
$3.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB018783NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD062744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke involves heterogeneity in injury and ongoing endogenous recovery, which are seldom stratified before testing post-stroke robot assisted motor training (RAMT). Pretraining variations, especially sensory-motor differences may also affect the gains achieved from the RAMT. Moreover, one assessment test may not effectively characterize the baseline sensory-motor status or the RAMT gains. Pre-therapy stratification may help personalize therapy and increase therapy gains. Towards this goal, we propose a data-driven approach to assess multiple functional scores with t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding and affinity propagation clustering, both for pre-therapy and RAMT gains. Data included behavioral scores from 27 people with chronic stroke who underwent RAMT for finger movement. Three clusters were observed at start-of-therapy (SoT), concurrent with the overall impairment level. Four clusters were observed for the RAMT gains, indicating specific improvements. The SoT clusters showed agreement with the RAMT gain clusters, suggesting that the pre-therapy state, assessed across multiple domains, could be useful in guiding RAMT interventions to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

RoboticsStrokeStroke RehabilitationAgedCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID40039510
PMCPMC12337343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.