ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2025
Foraging activity by an ecosystem engineer, the superb lyrebird, 'farms' its invertebrate prey.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Foraging activity by an ecosystem engineer, the superb lyrebird, 'farms' its invertebrate prey.The Journal of animal ecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ecosystem engineers shape ecological communities worldwide by modifying the habitats of other taxa. Engineering activities may generate feedbacks that benefit the engineers themselves, though such evidence is sparse. The superb lyrebird (Menura novaehollandiae), a ground-dwelling species of moist eucalypt forests in south-eastern Australia, engineers habitats by extensively modifying litter and soil layers (~155 tonnes/ha/year in suitable habitat) whilst foraging for invertebrates. We examined whether this engineering activity by lyrebirds serves to promote a 'farming' effect on their prey, by increasing the biomass and taxonomic richness of the invertebrates on which they feed and altering the composition of invertebrate communities. We experimentally isolated the effects of engineering (soil/litter modification) from predation effects (on invertebrates) by establishing a manipulative experiment with three treatments: (1) lyrebird-free, fenced exclosures ('control'; no engineering or predation); (2) fenced exclosures with raking ('raked'; engineering effects only); and (3) unfenced plots accessible to lyrebirds ('lyrebird'; engineering and predation effects). Biomass and taxonomic richness of invertebrates were higher in 'raked' treatments compared with 'control' treatments, due to the engineering effects of raking. Biomass and richness were lower in 'lyrebird' treatments, due to predation effects by lyrebirds. Whilst the composition of invertebrate communities showed no significant change due to engineering, it was significantly influenced by predation. Lyrebird foraging actions that mix, turn over, and aerate litter and soil layers create a positive feedback loop that actively replenishes the biomass and diversity of their invertebrate prey, compensating for offtake by predation. These results provide evidence that lyrebirds 'farm' their prey resource. This process of farming by the superb lyrebird operates at a spatial scale that is unprecedented in non-human vertebrates, extending across millions of ha in moist forest ecosystems. The enhanced diversity and biomass of invertebrates generated via lyrebird foraging has potentially far-reaching implications for the structure and function of forest ecosystems; and for the temporal dynamics of forests and their response to disturbance processes, such as wildfire. Reported examples of such positive feedback loops arising from ecosystem engineering activities are scarce, but may be more common than thought and have extensive impacts on ecosystem function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.