Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038831›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2025

Computational histology reveals that concomitant application of insect repellent with sunscreen impairs UV protection in an ex vivo human skin model.

Sophie Charrasse, Titouan Poquillon, Charlotte Saint-Omer, Audrey Schunemann, Mylène Weill, Victor Racine, Abdel Aouacheria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sophie CharrasseISEM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Titouan PoquillonISEM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Charlotte Saint-OmerISEM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Audrey SchunemannEDENCOS, 39 Ancienne Route Nationale 7, 69570, Dardilly, France.
Mylène WeillISEM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Victor RacineQuantaCell SAS, Hôpital Saint Eloi, IRMB, 80 Av Augustin Fliche, 34090, Montpellier, France.
Abdel AouacheriaISEM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France. abdel.aouacheria@umontpellier.fr.

Funding

ANR France Relance CNRS 234144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistological alterations such as nuclear abnormalities are sensitive biomarkers associated with diseases, tissue injury and environmental insults. While visual inspection and human interpretation of histology images are useful for initial characterization, such low-throughput procedures suffer from inherent limitations in terms of reliability, objectivity and reproducibility. Artificial intelligence and digital morphometry offer unprecedented opportunities to quickly and accurately assess nuclear morphotypes in relation to tissue damage including skin injury.

methodsIn this work, we designed NoxiScore, a pipeline providing an integrated, deep learning-based software solution for fully automated and quantitative analysis of nucleus-related features in histological sections of human skin biopsies. We used this pipeline to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three dermato-cosmetic products massively sold at the time of the study in the Montpellier area (South of France): a sunscreen containing UV filters, a mosquito repellent (with synthetic active ingredient IR3535) and a product combining a natural insect repellent plus a sunscreen. Hematoxylin and eosin or hematoxylin-eosin saffron staining was performed to assess skin structure before morphometric parameter computation.

resultsWe report the identification of a specific nuclear feature based on variation in texture information that can be used to assess skin tissue damage after oxidative stress or UV exposure. Our data show that application of the commercial sun cream provided efficient protection against UV effects in our ex vivo skin model, whereas application of the mosquito repellent as a single product exerted no protective or toxic effect. Notably, we found that concurrent application of the insect repellent with the sunscreen significantly decreased the UVB protective effect of the sunscreen. Last, histometric analysis of human skin biopsies from multiple donors indicates that the sunscreen-insect repellent combo displayed variable levels of protection against UV irradiation.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, our study is the first to evaluate the potential toxicity of combining real-life sunscreen and insect repellent products using ex vivo human skin samples, which most closely imitate the cutaneous physiology. The NoxiScore wet-plus-dry methodology has the potential to provide information about the pharmaco-toxicological profile of topically applied formulations and may also be useful for diagnostic purposes and evaluation of the skin exposome including pesticide exposure, air pollution and water contaminants.

Indexed as

Insect RepellentsSkinSunscreening AgentsUltraviolet RaysHumansInsect RepellentsSunscreening AgentsExposomeHistologyImage analysisInsect repellentMorphometryOrganelle biologySunscreenToxicology

Identifiers

PMID40038831
PMCPMC11881410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.