ArticleGenome biology2025
Benchmarking single-cell cross-omics imputation methods for surface protein expression.
Article in Genome biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- DGAT: a dual-graph attention network for inferring spatial protein landscapes from transcriptomics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Single-Cell and Spatial Omics: Methods and Applications.MedComm · 2026Review
- ImmunoPheno: A Computational Framework for Data-Driven Design and Analysis of Immunophenotyping Experiments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- cpiVAE: Robust and Interpretable Cross-Platform Proteomics Imputation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Benchmarking single-cell cross-omics imputation methods for surface protein expression.Genome biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent advances in single-cell multimodal omics sequencing have facilitated the simultaneous profiling of transcriptomes and surface proteomes within individual cells, offering insights into cellular functions and heterogeneity. However, the high costs and technical complexity of protocols like CITE-seq and REAP-seq constrain large-scale dataset generation. To overcome this limitation, surface protein data imputation methods have emerged to predict protein abundances from scRNA-seq data.
resultsWe present a comprehensive benchmark of twelve state-of-the-art imputation methods across eleven datasets and six scenarios. Our analysis evaluates the methods' accuracy, sensitivity to training data size, robustness across experiments, and usability in terms of running time, memory usage, popularity, and user-friendliness. With benchmark experiments in diverse scenarios and a comprehensive evaluation framework of the results, our study offers valuable insights into the performance and applicability of surface protein data imputation methods in single-cell omics research.
conclusionsBased on our results, Seurat v4 (PCA) and Seurat v3 (PCA) demonstrate exceptional performance, offering promising avenues for further research in single-cell omics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.