Observational studyBMC research notes2025
Association between knowledge of anticoagulation, INR control, and warfarin-related adverse events: a cross sectional study.
Observational study in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of localized circumferential elastic compression with short-term recanalization and safety during urokinase thrombolysis for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Patient perspectives of prosthetic heart valve choice and anticoagulation in patients with rheumatic heart disease: a semi-quantitative study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis cross-sectional observational study, conducted from 01/09/2023 to 01/11/2023, involved 200 warfarin-using patients outpatient clinics to assess the knowledge and understanding of warfarin among patients through face-to-face interviews.
resultsAlmost 70% of participants displayed insufficient knowledge about their warfarin therapy, potentially linked to inadequate counseling or patient comprehension. The participants had an average weekly warfarin dose of 32.9 ± 11.2, and more than half had used warfarin for at least 2 years. Only one third of patients most recent INR level was within the target range. Thirty-seven percent of patients experienced a thromboembolic event, and most of them required hospitalization. One hundred and eight patients (54.0%) experienced bleeding (minor, or major, or both). Eighty-two percent of participants correctly answered Question 8 of the OAK questionnaire regarding warfarin's indication for treating blood clots and 78% of the participants knew what the INR was. Moreover, the research revealed a positive correlation between higher education and adequate knowledge, with university-educated individuals exhibiting superior understanding. Conversely, a prolonged warfarin duration correlated with diminished knowledge, possibly indicating decreased patient vigilance. Furthermore, maintaining INR within the target range showed an association with sufficient knowledge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.