Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038778›Full record

Observational studyBMC research notes2025

Association between knowledge of anticoagulation, INR control, and warfarin-related adverse events: a cross sectional study.

Noor Kokash, Lobna Gharaibeh, Sura Al Zoubi

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noor KokashBiopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, 19328, Jordan.
Lobna GharaibehBiopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, 19328, Jordan. l.gharaibeh@ammanu.edu.jo.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7490-5465
Sura Al ZoubiDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Al-Balqa Applied University, As-Salt, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis cross-sectional observational study, conducted from 01/09/2023 to 01/11/2023, involved 200 warfarin-using patients outpatient clinics to assess the knowledge and understanding of warfarin among patients through face-to-face interviews.

resultsAlmost 70% of participants displayed insufficient knowledge about their warfarin therapy, potentially linked to inadequate counseling or patient comprehension. The participants had an average weekly warfarin dose of 32.9 ± 11.2, and more than half had used warfarin for at least 2 years. Only one third of patients most recent INR level was within the target range. Thirty-seven percent of patients experienced a thromboembolic event, and most of them required hospitalization. One hundred and eight patients (54.0%) experienced bleeding (minor, or major, or both). Eighty-two percent of participants correctly answered Question 8 of the OAK questionnaire regarding warfarin's indication for treating blood clots and 78% of the participants knew what the INR was. Moreover, the research revealed a positive correlation between higher education and adequate knowledge, with university-educated individuals exhibiting superior understanding. Conversely, a prolonged warfarin duration correlated with diminished knowledge, possibly indicating decreased patient vigilance. Furthermore, maintaining INR within the target range showed an association with sufficient knowledge.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInternational Normalized RatioWarfarinAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAnticoagulantsWarfarinAnticoagulationBleedingEducationINRQuestionnaireThrombosis

Identifiers

PMID40038778
PMCPMC11881488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.