ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
A deep learning model for radiological measurement of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using biplanar radiographs.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fully Automated Deep Learning-Based Lenke Classification for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using Multi-View Full-Spine Radiographs: Development and Clinical Validation.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- From Algorithms to Clinics: Recent Progress in AI for Scoliosis Diagnosis and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Reliability of Large Language Model-Based Artificial Intelligence in AIS Assessment: Lenke Classification and Fusion-Level Suggestion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on School-Based Scoliosis Screening Program in South Korea.Neurospine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate measurement of the spinal alignment parameters is crucial for diagnosing and evaluating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Manual measurement is subjective and time-consuming. The recently developed artificial intelligence models mainly focused on measuring the coronal Cobb angle (CA) and ignored the evaluation of the sagittal plane. We developed a deep-learning model that could automatically measure spinal alignment parameters in biplanar radiographs.
methodsIn this study, our model adopted ResNet34 as the backbone network, mainly consisting of keypoint detection and CA measurement. A total of 600 biplane radiographs were collected from our hospital and randomly divided into train and test sets in a 3:1 ratio. Two senior spinal surgeons independently manually measured and analyzed spinal alignment and recorded the time taken. The reliabilities of automatic measurement were evaluated by comparing them with the gold standard, using mean absolute difference (MAD), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), simple linear regression, and Bland-Altman plots. The diagnosis performance of the model was evaluated through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC). Severity classification and sagittal abnormalities classification were visualized using a confusion matrix.
resultsOur AI model achieved the MAD of coronal and sagittal angle errors was 2.15° and 2.72°, and ICC was 0.985, 0.927. The simple linear regression showed a strong correction between all parameters and the gold standard (p < 0.001, r
conclusionsThis deep learning model can accurately and automatically measure spinal alignment parameters with reliable results, significantly reducing diagnostic time, and might provide the potential to assist clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.