Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038713›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Evaluation of the coordinated development of health resources, health service utilization, and the regional economy in China and analysis of influencing factors.

Lina Shao, Zhonghua Suo, Shasha Song, Ying Lang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lina Shao *Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Humanities and Management, Ningxia Medical University, No. 1160, Shengli Street, Xingqing District, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.
Zhonghua Suo *Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Humanities and Management, Ningxia Medical University, No. 1160, Shengli Street, Xingqing District, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.
Shasha SongDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Humanities and Management, Ningxia Medical University, No. 1160, Shengli Street, Xingqing District, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.
Ying LangDepartment of Health Policy and Management, School of Humanities and Management, Ningxia Medical University, No. 1160, Shengli Street, Xingqing District, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China. 1072861385@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study investigates the coupling coordination relationships and influencing factors of health resources, health service utilization, and regional economy in China, aiming to provide reasonable suggestions for promoting the coordinated development of medical and health services and regional economy.

methodsThe panel data from 2016 to 2021 on China's health resources, health service utilization were analyzed concerning China's health resources, health service utilization, and regional economy. These included the entropy weight method for index weight calculation, the synthesis level index for subsystem synthesis level calculation, a coupled coordinated development model, exploratory spatial data analysis, and a geographic detector model. These analytical approaches facilitated the examination of spatial and temporal variances, alongside the identification of driving factors influencing the coupled and coordinated development of health resources, health service utilization, and regional economy in China.

resultsThe findings reveal that (1) a high level of coupling exists among the three subsystems across all provinces in China. (2) Concerning the spatial pattern of coupling coordination, notable regional differences are observed in the degree of coupling coordination between health resource utilization, health service utilization, and regional economic development, with a noticeable decline from east to west and central regions positioned in between. (3) Regarding spatial evolution characteristics, an overall trend of higher levels is observed in the east and north compared to the west and south, indicating localized spatial clustering. In the south‒north direction, there is a parabolic rise followed by a decline from north to south. In the east‒west direction, there is an inverted "U" shaped curve with gradual strengthening from east to west. (4) The spatial disparities in synergetic development among health resource utilization, health service utilization, and the regional economy arise from multiple influencing factors interacting with each other. (5) Spatial variations are noted in the impacts of driving factors on coordinated development among health resource utilization, health service utilization, and the regional economy during different time periods.

conclusionRegional disparities primarily arise from various factors, such as healthcare visit frequency, healthcare human resource availability, and healthcare material resource allocation; moreover, these factors also vary geographically across different time periods. Strategic measures for medical care services and economic development should be formulated by each region based on its own circumstances to enhance economic benefits and achieve coordinated high-quality development among health resource utilization, health service utilization, and the regional economy.

Indexed as

Economic DevelopmentHealth ResourcesHealth ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareChinaHumansCoupling coordinationHealth resourcesHealth service utilizationInfluencing factorsRegional economy

Identifiers

PMID40038713
PMCPMC11881486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.