Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40038704›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

The role of explainable artificial intelligence in disease prediction: a systematic literature review and future research directions.

Razan Alkhanbouli, Hour Matar Abdulla Almadhaani, Farah Alhosani, Mecit Can Emre Simsekler

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Classification of Alcohol Use Disorder With Explainable AI.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Wearable Flexible Sensors for Cardiovascular Disease Monitoring.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Explainable AI: Ethical Frameworks, Bias, and the Necessity for Benchmarks.European journal of pediatric surgery : official journal of Austrian Association of Pediatric Surgery ... [et al] = Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Razan Alkhanbouli *Department of Management Science & Engineering, Khalifa University of Science & Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Hour Matar Abdulla Almadhaani *Department of Management Science & Engineering, Khalifa University of Science & Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Farah AlhosaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering & Biotechnology, Khalifa University of Science & Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Mecit Can Emre SimseklerDepartment of Management Science & Engineering, Khalifa University of Science & Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAE. emre.simsekler@ku.ac.ae.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) enhances transparency and interpretability in AI models, which is crucial for trust and accountability in healthcare. A potential application of XAI is disease prediction using various data modalities. This study conducts a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) following the PRISMA protocol, synthesizing findings from 30 selected studies to examine XAI's evolving role in disease prediction. It explores commonly used XAI methods, such as Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), and their impact across medical fields in disease prediction. The review highlights key gaps, including limited dataset diversity, model complexity, and reliance on single data types, emphasizing the need for greater interpretability and data integration. Addressing these issues is crucial for advancing AI in healthcare. This study contributes by outlining current challenges and potential solutions, suggesting directions for future research to develop more reliable and robust XAI methods.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiagnosisDiseaseHumansDecision support systemsDisease predictionDisease recognitionExplainable artificial intelligenceHealthcare AIMachine learningPatient safetyRisk managementXAI

Identifiers

PMID40038704
PMCPMC11877768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.