ArticleBMC health services research2025
Leadership in sustainment of Individual Placement and Support model: a comparative case study in Finland.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vocational rehabilitation job coaching based on the Individual Placement and Support model: protocol for a mixed methods implementation study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Legitimacy, embedding, and learning framework: lessons from individual placement and support for analyzing sustainment and scale-up of complex psychosocial interventions.International journal of public health · 2026Review
- Leadership in sustainment of Individual Placement and Support model: a comparative case study in Finland.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividual Placement and Support is an evidence-based practice designed to assist individuals with psychiatric disorders in gaining employment. Contextual factors such as policies, funding, and organizational structures are widely acknowledged as barriers and facilitators to the sustainment of evidence-based practices. This study focuses on leadership's role in driving the sustainment process and navigating the dynamic interplay between internal and external contexts following a national development project in Finland.
methodsWe used qualitative data from semi-structured interviews. Participants included outside experts such as trainers and researchers (n = 4), leaders from the implementing sites, including medical directors, nursing directors, administrators (n = 11), project managers and team leaders (n = 6), and frontline workers (n = 8). We performed an abductive thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes within the data.
resultsWe identified three Leadership Approaches for IPS Model Sustainability that differentiated agencies with more robust sustainment strategies from those with less robust ones. The Visionary Approach included championing recovery-oriented principles to foster organizational readiness and aligning IPS with organizational goals. The Proactive Approach was characterized by early and deliberate planning to minimize challenges, leveraging IPS fidelity evaluations for quality improvement. Leaders employing the Collaborative Approach emphasized effective facilitation within governance structures, including the integration of IPS into the strategies of administrative units.
conclusionsThe study presents three leadership approaches that differentiate implementing agencies with more robust IPS model sustainment strategies from those with less robust ones. It introduces and empirically explores a conceptual model that can be used both in research and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.